Monday, March 1, 2010

Week 8: The last one! (maybe...)

Determine one unit in Differentiating in Practice: A Resource Guilde for Differentiating Curriculum (Tomlinson & Eidson, 2003) that seems appropriate for the grade level of your field/student-teaching class. Read everything about that unit thoroughly.
I chose Unit 4: The World of Geometry
Explain:
1) what impresses you most about the unit? In the unit, I was most impressed with how thorough it was. It covered everything that was basic about geometry. I also liked that it used tiered activities, as well as journal keeping! I think math journals are WONDERFUL and completely underrated.
2) anything you learn about differentiation, just from studying this one unit From this unit, I learned that it is so important to differentiate in every content area. Math is (I would assume) the most disliked subject of all the subjects. If you only have one way for math to be done in the classroom, you aren't working WITH all of your students and their learning needs. However, when differentiated, math can be adapted to the learning ways of all of the students when options are given. For example, in a math journal the students can record their notes however they want. They can reflect on circles instead of learning blah blah blah about "this is a circle" (in a Ben Stein voice).
3) what you don't understand about the unit or how it works This seems like a lot of information to be learned before the final assessment. I don't understand how the students are to remember things from Lesson 1 when they are all the way at the end working on the assessment. Is that what the journal would be used for? So the students can look back on their notes from previous lessons? I guess that's a very general question, but I don't understand how that works. Period.
4) what, other than the content, you believe you would have to modify in the unit if you were going to teach it to your student-teaching class I would definitely have to modify Lesson 8 where they look for shapes in flags. I would make it where the students would look for shapes everywhere!

5) why you would modify it I don't want students to just think that interesting geometry is found in flags; I want them to know that it is everywhere. This would help them think outside of the box, instead of me giving them a flag picture and telling them to find geometric shapes.
6) how you would modify it I would have them go on a scavenger hunt around the school in groups (to keep them under control) where they have to find figures in geometric shapes, interview various faculty members about geometric shapes, and introduce an interesting fact about geometry to that faculty that they did not already know. This would force interaction, but because I would put them in groups, only those who wanted to talk would have to. (Not everyone likes to interact... I know this because I was one of those people!). Or, instead of doing it around the school, they would have to do it around their town as a weekend homework assignment so their parents could get involved too.

1 comment:

  1. Great responses... just a couple of things I'd like "discuss" (which really will just be a lecture... sorry!): When you're teaching kids geometry, they will likely be a LITTLE bit oder... 4th grade or above, and if you give them an assignment to find shapes everywhere, you're going to have just a few kids who take it seriously and do it. The rest of them will be in various stages of "off-taskness" -- Giving them the assignment to find shapes in flags, and then give them a definite source to work with, puts a beginning and an end to the assignment... they know what to do, can get it done, and move on. They won't be a management problem, like you would have on your hands if you switched it to finding shapes everywhere. On the other hand, if you specify how many of each shape you want them to find, it would be okay to have them look "anywhere" -- because again, there is a definite beginning and end to that assignment. 4 points

    ReplyDelete